Management

Ing. František Gale, Bursar


In this annual report, we have been reviewing the 1999 calendar year in order to evaluate and compare its economic indicators with indicators of previous years. The economic and qualitative indicators document the activity of Masaryk University, and objectify statements described in the report.

Each year has its own characteristics. Each period evaluated reflects both the internal situation of the university and economic situation in the Czech Republic. The economic situation plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of all organizations which are economically dependent on the state budget.

What were the external and internal conditions of the year 1999?

With regard to all the difficulties of 1999, it is possible to consider this year as a transformation period for MU, in which it was necessary to solve all operational problems and maintain the investment plan.

Concerning MU financing, the following issues were the most problematic:

The above-described ministerial decisions caused complications for Masaryk University, especially its faculties.

At the beginning of 1999, in spite of MU’s efforts to minimize redistribution processes at the university, it was necessary to reduce to the minimum level the financial requirements of individual MU faculties. At the same time, the university focused on gaining financing from sources other sources than the state budget.

Despite all efforts - and for the first time since November 1989 - Masaryk University experienced a loss amounting to CZK 3.8. mill. in operational means.

Comparing the figures of the year 1999, the total profit amounted to CZK 1.177 billion and total expenses to CZK 1.181 billion, i.e. there was a minimal loss covered by the reserve fund.

On the other hand, however, the negative economic result was a warning signal; with regard to the further development of the university and the ”Long-term Outlook of Masaryk University up to the Year 2005” document, it is necessary to find a fundamental solution for MU financing.

The level of MU’s economic loss was offset by income from supplementary activities amounting to CZK 25.2 million.

Concerning the main MU activities, the loss amounted to CZK 29 million. This fact means that at future negotiations with the Ministry of Education, it will be necessary to insist on the changing of its appropriation policy conditions. All universities similar to Masaryk University lose out by the outdated normative financing of faculties with a low demand coefficient. Development of the last five years has shown that the use of computer technology at faculties specializing in humanities and ”virtualization” of many laboratory processes at technical faculties have obliterated the former dividing of faculties into so called ”cheap” and ”expensive” (manifested in different coefficients).

Another significant economic factor is the growth of depreciations, which have become part of educational subsidies, and reduce excessively - especially in the case of active universities - the total sum of financing necessary for running the university.

The above-stated system drawbacks are not the only factors influencing the economic performance of the university. The activities of MU faculties and its sections are another significant aspect, as the faculties did not manage to decrease their expenses and increase necessary output.

The profit of Masaryk University amounted to CZK 216 million from its main activity and c. 82 million from supplementary activities; the current level of MU development, however, requires faster growth in its output.

In 1999, the state budget subsidy for MU amounted to CZK 879.9 million but with regard to the ministerial coefficient system, Masaryk University received c. CZK 100 million less then the Technical University (VUT Brno), the size and equipment requirements of which are comparable to those of our university. This fact has to be analysed and used as an argument for necessary changes in the appropriation policy of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic.

Investments are an independent part of the evaluation of the year 1999. In this field, we have succeeded to maintain the trend of previous years. Masaryk University invested a total of CZK 254.8 million, of that CZK 107.3 from its own sources.

An amount of CZK 101 million from the state budget was used for building projects, CZK 42 million for sources not included in investments.

The Investment Property Reproduction Fund (FRIM) consists mainly of depreciations and increases investment activities. On the other hand, it burdens the operational field with depreciations of investment properties as the subsidies do not respect investment growth (especially by grant activities).

In the field of research and development, we have received a total of CZK 182 million, of which CZK 75.6 million was for creative achievement. In comparison with 1998, this means a subsidy growth; our university, however, needs a higher sum for the implementation of a greater number of activities and projects in the field of research and development.

A supplementary subsidy for the Halls of Residence and Refectories Administration amounted to CZK 51 million. That sum is lower than in 1998, and shows that it is necessary to search for new solutions.

With regard to the fulfilment of the 1998 analysis, we may state that the year 1999 was a relatively balanced year, during which, however, MU had to face negative influences at ministerial (system problems in the ministerial appropriation policy) and university levels (failing in maintenance of a positive economic result).

With regard to the above statement, the year 2000 will be of fundamental importance, and should not allow the situation of previous years when it did not respond as necessary to the expected development of MU.

 

Table 1 - Number of students in comparison with number of employees 1991-1999

 

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Number of students

9 728

10 575

11 544

11 629

12 837

15 401

16 741

18 026

18 785

Num. of employees

2 182

2 232

2 309

2 309

2 275

2 435

2 458

2 477

2 497

Student/employee

4,46

4,74

5,00

5,04

5,64

6,32

6,81

7,28

7,52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2 - Statistics of employees and students - 1999

 

Employees

Degree students

All students

Faculty 

teachers

others 

total

number

student/ teacher ratio

Stud. / others ratio

Stud. / total ratio

number  

student/ teacher ratio

Stud. / others ratio

Stud. / total ratio

FM

303,64

221,72

525,36

2 003

6,60

9,03

3,81

2 003

6,60

9,03

3,81

FA

171,33

84,20

255,53

3 008

17,56

35,72

11,77

3 008

17,56

35,72

11,77

FL

73,97

64,51

138,48

2 451

33,14

37,99

17,70

2 451

33,14

37,99

17,70

SchSS

32,69

21,87

54,56

935

28,60

42,75

17,14

935

28,60

42,75

17,14

FS

211,74

276,68

488,42

2 356

11,13

8,52

4,82

2 360

11,15

8,53

4,83

FI

43,38

48,24

91,62

1 217

28,05

25,23

13,28

1 240

28,58

25,70

13,53

FE

214,56

112,16

326,72

3 574

16,66

31,87

10,94

4 144

19,31

36,95

12,68

FEA

61,94

55,57

117,51

2 211

35,70

39,79

18,82

2 211

35,70

39,79

18,82

Others

82,04

194,44

276,48

0

0

0

0

433

5,28

2,23

1,57

SKM

0

222,27

222,27

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

1195,29

1301,66

2496,95

17 755

14,85

13,64

7,11

18 785

15,72

14,43

7,52

 

 

 

Table 3 - Non-investment means per student 1991-1999 in thousands of CZK

 

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Non-investment funding of the Ministry of Education

296 420

312 950

425 123

518 252

637 285

728 155

751 761

851 717

879 955

Number of students

9 728

10 575

11 544

11 629

12 837

15 401

16 741

18 026

18 875

Non-investments/student

30,47

29,59

36,83

44,53

49,64

47,28

44,91

47,25

46,62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4 - Non-investment means gained from grants between 1992 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

Faculty

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

FM

173

3 286

6 346

6 994

12 474

13 962

13 449

21 642

FA

0

2 196

2 034

4 660

4 786

6 794

2 290

5 946

FL

28

10

0

88

78

207

251

148

SchSS

           

3 354

5 851

FS

2 187

7 743

10 733

10 437

17 067

22 507

32 649

51 297

FI

   

310

2 870

934

523

3 656

7 875

FE

2 930

1 196

2 021

900

984

1 756

1 966

2 477

FEA

386

80

157

1 048

1 282

1 496

1 952

1 884

Others

 

7 888

15 134

24 631

15 133

4 027

8 683

3 578

 

of this:

             

RO

0

0

0

500

170

316

156

156

ICS

0

0

0

21 460

14 212

2 900

7 840

3 290

CDV

0

0

0

2 671

751

811

687

132

Total

5 956

22 399

36 735

51 628

52 738

51 272

68 250

100 698

 

 

Table 5 - Investment means gained from grants between 1992 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

Faculty

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

FM

0

1 260

2 500

9 526

3 823

1 832

2 879

6 468

FA

0

352

519

1 524

1 499

1 123

1 380

2 746

FL

0

0

0

75

40

594

55

0

SchSS

           

1 325

476

FS

305

2 353

5 690

5 245

45 521

19 298

21 737

24 343

FI

   

40

2 170

3 140

1 689

7 923

3 095

FE

187

233

188

221

138

340

610

187

FEA

0

45

157

33

0

0

611

0

Others

0

10 049

19 153

19 903

28 665

17 077

31 327

9 320

 

of this:

             

RO

0

0

0

0

30

0

100

0

ICS

0

0

0

19 713

28 635

17 077

31 227

9 320

CDV

0

0

0

190

0

0

0

0

Total

492

14 292

28 090

38 697

82 826

41 953

67 847

46 635

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 6 - Outlay for salaries gained between 1993 and 1998 in thousands of CZK (1999 - unlimited)

Faculty

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

FM

82

834

995

1 644

3 448

3 487

5 578

FA

88

932

1 405

1 286

1 845

711

1 945

FL

0

0

15

41

42

78

43

ScSS

         

1 419

2 949

FS

238

1 510

2 375

3 440

5 971

8 071

17 693

FI

 

0

75

40

106

1 186

3 681

FE

655

754

146

184

334

629

714

FEA

137

12

519

294

415

670

578

Others

1 810

948

1 528

693

504

557

930

out this:

           

RO

0

30

0

80

30

30

49

ICS

38

188

 

275

170

158

879

CDV

1 772

730

1 528

338

304

369

2

Total

3 010

4 990

7 058

7 622

12 665

16 808

34 808

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 7 - Earnings from supplementary activities between 1991 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

Faculty

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

FM

5 610

19 816

29 949

32 617

37 071

43 351

8 863

FA

1 804

4 003

3 293

1 946

2 422

3 890

677

FL

9 686

19 030

14 083

20 698

18 083

20 416

3 825

SchSS

         

375

231

FS

7 240

8 786

9 349

9 254

9 712

14 773

17 107

FI

     

691

180

163

448

FE

1 456

465

860

1 376

1 185

1 190

3 315

FEA

1 274

2 924

3 478

2 526

3 087

3 078

5 579

Others

5 671

11 319

24 184

31 089

27 955

29 459

24 243

Total

32 741

66 343

85 196

100 197

99 695

116 695

64 288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 8 - Financial means gained from academics’ grants between 1992 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

 

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Means from grants

6 448

39 701

69 815

97 383

135 564

93 225

136 097

147 333

Number of academics

1 049

1 079

1 107

1 089

1 135

1 145

1 151

1 195

Grant/academic

6,15

36,79

63,07

89,42

119,44

81,42

118,26

123,29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 9 – Financial means gained from additional activities per employee between 1991 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

 

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Means from additional activities

28 070

35 583

32 741

66 343

85 196

100 197

99 695

116 695

64 288

Number of employees

2 182

2 232

2 309

2 309

2 275

2 435

2 448

2 477

2 497

Additional activity/employee

12,86

15,94

14,18

28,73

37,45

41,15

40,72

47,11

25,75

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 10 - MU employee between 1990 and 1999 (teachers)

 

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

FM

315,0

314,4

322,1

320,1

309,3

305,0

290,5

294,71

293,67

303,64

FA

159,4

173,2

175,7

179,4

183,8

188,6

186,6

191,71

170,33

171,33

FL

50,5

57,8

62,5

69,5

71,3

73,3

70,5

74,72

76,54

73,97

SchSS

               

24,32

32,69

FS

181,2

200,4

211,0

208,4

202,5

195,3

200,0

195,86

196,76

211,74

FI

       

6,6

20,7

24,5

28,32

28,66

43,38

FE

181,9

193,5

197,7

205,5

225,8

232,5

233,5

226,97

219,40

214,56

FEA

 

8,6

13,2

21,2

29,9

47,2

57,0

58,29

60,38

61,94

Others

81,4

54,2

67,0

75,0

78,2

72,6

72,7

74,06

80,75

82,04

Total

969,4

1 002,1

1 049,2

1 079,1

1 107,4

1 135,2

1 135,3

1 144,64

1 150,81

1 195,29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 11 - MU employees between 1990 and 1999 (non-teaching staff)

Faculty

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

FM

278,8

277,4

268,5

271,1

267,0

269,6

269,0

269,82

238,75

221,72

FA

84,3

88,5

88,5

93,7

93,2

88,1

92,9

96,34

86,00

84,20

FL

42,2

57,2

54,0

66,9

65,3

80,5

72,9

69,13

66,84

64,51

SchSS

               

21,31

21,87

FS

234,3

223,7

226,9

234,5

232,8

245,3

247,8

264,51

277,92

276,68

FI

         

19,7

36,1

40,99

53,95

48,24

FE

115,1

105,9

102,1

101,1

103,3

112,9

117,3

116,71

112,03

112,16

FEA

 

29,6

26,5

27,4

29,7

40,5

45,5

39,17

47,40

55,57

Others

206,3

179,9

196,3

196,4

180,5

187,7

189,5

192,96

187,25

194,44

SKM

255,6

217,7

220,0

230,6

226,2

217,8

228,3

224,19

235,05

222,27

Total

1 216,6

1 179,9

1 182,8

1 219,7

1 202,0

1 262,1

1 299,3

1 313,82

1326,50

1 301,66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 12 - Budget non-investment fianancial means between 1991 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

296 420

312 950

425 123

518 252

637 285

728 155

751 761

851 717

909 626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 13 - Costs for the maintenance of MU buildings between 1991 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

Year

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Amount

9 451

17 061

19 738

22 155

21 192

41 023

48 685

63 833

66 458

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 14 - Immovable assets between 1991 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

172 768

198 978

214 478

232 465

410 972

490 902

556 326

811 241

1 260 731

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 15 - MU movable assets between 1991 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

372 787

418 367

461 685

506 541

614 659

728 618

828 203

938 231

1 154 398

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 16 - Depreciations at MU between 1992 and 1999 in thousands of CZK

 

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

Property depreciations

35 220

36 395

39 696

44 946

60 755

79 169

94 963

125 535

Depreciations from economic result of previous year

 

11 210

6 329

9 729

12 843

10 000

5 181

0

Total depreciation

35 220

47 605

46 025

54 675

73 598

89 169

100 144

125 535

Funds for depreciations

10 000

36 355

13 588

54 435

55 397

60 801

57 544

0